Planning and Analysis

Institutional Research

Assessment

Academic Support CenterAcademic Affairs

 

Helping students learn so that they may become productive, creative, ethical, and engaged citizens.

 
 

CQI - Main Page

Goals

Action Teams

Academic Dashboard

Facilitator Group Meetings

Members List

Newsletter

OQAF Application

Process

Self-Assessment Meetings

Tools

Contact Us

 

 

Benchmarking
 

Purpose:

Benchmarking is a process of comparing your process, program,

department or institution against the best in the field. Unlike “peer”

comparisons that are focused on like types and seek to set a standard,

benchmarks are more aspirational in nature. Who is the best at whatever it

is? Let’s find them and see how they know they’re the best, how they do

what they do well, and let’s find what we can learn from them and apply it.



“Peer” comparisons tend to always be in the same field. Benchmarking

may take you outside the sanctity of higher education. If you were in

admissions, perhaps you would look at hotel “admissions” or admissions

to a hospital to find a benchmark. If you’re a nursing department, you may

decide to look at a hospital with the best nursing education department or

even the best nursing program. What is it they do that you can transfer to

your system?



Steps:

 

The steps will vary greatly depending upon the project, but here is a basic

outline of what might need to occur:



1. Create the team. Make sure all stakeholders are represented.

 

2. Understand and describe what it is you’re working with at UCO. For

instance, if it’s a process you want to benchmark, do a process map so

that you thoroughly understand what happens here.

 

3. Identify comparable campuses or other places recognized for expertise

in the area you are benchmarking. Institutional Research maintains a list of

peer institutions that will serve if you have no other institutions in mind.

Remember, it does not always have to be higher education that you use as

a comparison.

 

4. Gather data through research, which may include interviews with

members of your benchmark institutions.

 

5. Analyze the data. What is it that they do that is different?

 

6. Recommend changes, based on your study, that you want to consider

for adaptation.

 

7. Monitor the adaptations. Don’t assume that they will work here—

follow-up. This is the PDCA cycle in action.


References:

 

R.M. Epper, (1999, November/December), “Applying Benchmarking To

Higher Education”, Change, pp. 24-31.


S.C. Rush, (1993) “Benchmarking—How Good Is Good?” In Joel W.

Meyerson & William F. Massy (Eds.), Measuring Institutional

Performance In Higher Education (pp. 83-97), Princeton, N.J.: Petersons’

The Stanford Forum for Higher Education Futures.


B.S. Shafer and L.E. Coate, (1992, November), “Benchmarking in Higher

Education: A Tool for Improving Quality and Reducing Cost”, NACUBO

Business Officer, pp. 28-35.


J.W. Alstete, (1995), “Benchmarking In Higher Education: Adapting Best

Practices To Improve Quality”, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report

No. 5, Washington D.C.: The George Washington University Graduate

School of Education and Human Development.


 

 

August 04, 2005